Skip to content

CVE-2006-2389

Code Injection: Is CVE-2006-2389 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
Exploit-DB
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
9.3 Critical
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
39%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-94 · Code Injection
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

A working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2000 SP3, and other products, allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via an Office file with a malformed property that triggers memory corruption related to record lengths, aka "Microsoft Office Property Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-1316.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2006-2389
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2006-2389/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2006-2389)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2006-2389"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2006-2389/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2006-2389"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: TruePositive's read from public sources is Real & exploitable — a starting point, not a community verdict.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    A working public exploit is published for this, so the barrier to attack is low. FIRST EPSS estimates about a 39% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, which is high relative to most CVEs. Patch this on priority and confirm the fix holds.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-94 · Code Injection.