CVE-2013-4786
Is CVE-2013-4786 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.
signals
public sources
High severity and high exploitation probability. Prioritise remediation.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Likely real & worth prioritising
High base severity and a high real-world exploitation probability both point to a genuine, actively targeted issue.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
The IPMI 2.0 specification supports RMCP+ Authenticated Key-Exchange Protocol (RAKP) authentication, which allows remote attackers to obtain password hashes and conduct offline password guessing attacks by obtaining the HMAC from a RAKP message 2 response from a BMC.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2013-4786)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2013-4786"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2013-4786/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2013-4786"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsNo account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-255.