CVE-2019-25719
Is CVE-2019-25719 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Real, but low real-world risk
A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Dräger Infinity Acute Care System and Standalone Infinity M540 patient monitors running software versions VG4.1.1, VG4.0.3, and lower contain network message handling vulnerabilities that allow network-adjacent attackers to spoof or tamper with data and cause denial-of-service conditions. Attackers with access to an enabled Infinity network port or physical proximity to a wireless access point can modify device settings such as alarm states or alarm limits, and overwhelm the system with incoming data causing the device to reboot and lose network functionality.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-25719)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-25719"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-25719/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2019-25719"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsCurated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.
No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
- 0
This scores high on paper (CVSS 8.6) but the real-world signal is low. It is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit was found, and near-term exploitation looks unlikely. Verify your own exposure before treating it as urgent. It is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, which is the most dangerous profile. Not an emergency for most teams, but patch it in your normal cycle and check whether the affected component is actually exposed in your setup.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-924.
- CVE-2026-39827MED 6.5DisputedEPSS 0%
An authenticated SSH client that repeatedly opened channels which were rejected by the server caused unbounded memory growth, eventually crashing the server process and affecting all connected users. Rejected channels are now properly removed from the connection's internal state and released for garbage collection.
- CVE-2023-26979LOW 3.1EPSS 0%
Bluetens Electrostimulation Device BluetensQ device app version 4.3.15 is vulnerable to Man-in-the-middle attacks in the BLE channel. It allows attackers to decrease or increase the intensity of the stimulator by hijacking the BLE communication.
- CVE-2026-12576HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 0%
DVP80ES3 with Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel vulnerability.
- CVE-2026-54891LOW 3.7EPSS 0%
Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (tls_gen_connection module) allows a network-positioned attacker to inject unauthenticated plaintext that the TLS client application later treats as authenticated server data. The function tls_gen_connection:handle_protocol_record/3 rejects APPLICATION_DATA records that arrive in pre-handshake states when the TLS endpoint acts as a server, but does not apply the same check when the endpoint acts as a client. A network-positioned attacker can send plaintext APPLICATION_DATA records to the client during the handshake. The records are buffered and, once the handshake completes successfully, delivered to the application as if they were authenticated post-handshake data. The attacker cannot observe the client's response or steer the connection, so the impact is limited to blind injection of unauthenticated bytes. The injection window is wider for TLS versions prior to TLS 1.3 than for TLS 1.3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/tls_gen_connection.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before 29.0.3, 28.5.0.3 and 27.3.4.14 corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.7.3, 11.6.0.3 and 11.2.12.10. TLS 1.3 is affected starting with OTP 22.0, when TLS 1.3 support was added.