CVE-2024-30090
Is CVE-2024-30090 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Real, but low real-world risk
A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Microsoft Streaming Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
NVD only has a brief summary for this one. The community fills in the real-world detail below.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30090)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30090"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30090/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-30090"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsCurated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.
No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
- 0
This scores high on paper (CVSS 7) but the real-world signal is low. It is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit was found, and near-term exploitation looks unlikely (EPSS about 2%). Verify your own exposure before treating it as urgent. It needs local access, so it reads more as a privilege-escalation or post-access risk than a remote one. Not an emergency for most teams, but patch it in your normal cycle and check whether the affected component is actually exposed in your setup.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-822.
- CVE-2024-21338HIGH 7.8KEVEPSS 52%
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
- CVE-2024-35250HIGH 7.8KEVEPSS 25%
Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-40369HIGH 7.8Real · low riskEPSS 5%
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
- CVE-2026-50424HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 1%
Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Domain Controller allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
- CVE-2026-48137CRIT 9.1Real · low riskEPSS 1%
There is an untrusted pointer dereference vulnerability in the NI grpc-device sideband streaming API that may allow an attacker to cause an arbitrary memory dereference, potentially resulting in remote code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to supply a specially crafted Moniker protobuf message. This affects NI grpc-device 2.17.0 and prior versions.
- CVE-2026-50479HIGH 7.8Real · low riskEPSS 0%
Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows USB Hub Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.