CVE-2025-65672
Is CVE-2025-65672 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.
public exploits
links to sources — we don’t host codeUnverified proof-of-concept code has been published. It may or may not be functional — assess before relying on it.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Real, but low real-world risk
A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in classroomio 0.1.13 allows unauthorized share and invite access to course settings.
NVD only has a brief summary for this one. The community fills in the real-world detail below.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-65672)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-65672"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-65672/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-65672"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsNo account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-639.
- CVE-2026-55255HIGH 8.4KEVEPSS 1%
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.1, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in /api/v1/responses endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim's flow ID in the request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.1.
- CVE-2026-56765CRIT 9.8
Vikunja before 2.2.1 contains an authorization flaw where the LinkSharing.ReadAll endpoint exposes share hashes to users with read access, enabling permission escalation to admin-level shares. The GetTaskAttachment endpoint performs permission checks against user-supplied task IDs but fetches attachments by sequential ID without verifying ownership, allowing attackers to download and delete all file attachments across all projects instance-wide.
- CVE-2026-61460HIGH 8.8
Krayin CRM through 2.2.3 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in LeadController, PersonController, OrganizationController, QuoteController, and ActivityController that allows authenticated users to edit, update, or delete records owned by other users. Attackers can modify CRM records and reassign ownership by exploiting missing record-level ownership validation in edit, update, and destroy methods.
- CVE-2026-2398HIGH 8.8
Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Adam Retail Automation Ltd. MobilMen 20T allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects MobilMen 20T: from v3 through 10072026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CVE-2026-6212HIGH 8.8
Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Teracity Software Technologies Inc. TeraMIS allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects TeraMIS: from V03.26.01.14 through 30.04.2026.
- CVE-2026-58660HIGH 8.1
Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member of at least one project can enumerate and move (corrupt/hide) tasks belonging to any other project on the same instance, including private projects they have no membership or role on.