Skip to content

CVE-2026-10662

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2026-10662 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.2%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A vulnerability was found in ahujasid blender-mcp up to 7636d13bded82eca58eb93c3f4cd8708dfdfbe8b. The affected element is the function requests.get of the file src/blender_mcp/server.py of the component ZIP File Handler. The manipulation of the argument zip_file_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The patch is identified as 5b37be25242e73dc4cf1328974d30458b9e5d67e. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-10662
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10662/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10662)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10662"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10662/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-10662"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Related CVEs

Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).