Is CVE-2026-12166 exploitable?

No community verdicts yet for CVE-2026-12166. Be the first to weigh in.

Is CVE-2026-12166 a false positive?

No community verdicts yet for CVE-2026-12166.

How do I remediate CVE-2026-12166?

See the authoritative references (NVD, vendor advisory) and community field notes on this page for remediation guidance.

CVE-2026-12166

Is CVE-2026-12166 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild

Not listed

CISA KEV

Public exploit

PoC (unverified)

Metasploit/EDB/PoC

Base severity

5.5 Medium

CVSS

Exploitation prob.

0.2%

FIRST EPSS

Weakness

Not classified

CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

GitHub PoCunverified

Unverified proof-of-concept code has been published. It may or may not be functional — assess before relying on it.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability for driver `GFAC_Sys_x64.sys` in Little Orbit GFAC allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via crafted requests that trigger a system crash.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published Jul 2, 2026

Embed this verdict

Markdown

[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-12166/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-12166)

HTML

<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-12166"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-12166/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-12166"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts

Real, but not a risk here

Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

0
Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated
Proof-of-concept code is on GitHub. Exploitation has been demonstrated, though it may need adapting to a real target.

Add a field note or remediationoptional