Skip to content

CVE-2026-14714

Improper Authentication: Is CVE-2026-14714 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.5 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.5%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-287 · Improper Authentication
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

A weakness has been identified in zhayujie chatgpt-on-wechat CowAgent 2.1.0. This issue affects the function verify_server of the file channel/wechatmp/common.py of the component wx Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument wechatmp_token causes missing authentication. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 2.1.1 is capable of addressing this issue. Patch name: 3d7c68bac6ee74fad63f43cf99e45c62e202ed55. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. The project confirms: "We've added an explicit non-empty check for wechatmp_token in verify_server() so that the /wx endpoint now fails closed with 403 Forbidden whenever the token is missing or left at the default empty value, instead of relying on a signature check that silently degenerates to a predictable hash."

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-14714
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14714/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14714)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14714"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14714/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-14714"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-287 · Improper Authentication.