Skip to content

CVE-2026-15189

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2026-15189 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.2%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A security vulnerability has been detected in aerostackdev aerostack-mcp up to 6315dfde7df0a15aaf743f88d91347115e09ba23. Affected by this issue is the function upload_media of the component mcp-whatsapp. Such manipulation of the argument media_url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. This product operates on a rolling release basis, ensuring continuous delivery. Consequently, there are no version details for either affected or updated releases. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15189
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15189/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15189)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15189"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15189/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15189"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).