Skip to content

CVE-2026-15628

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2026-15628 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
n/a
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie chatgpt-on-wechat CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This issue affects the function Vision._download_to_data_url of the file agent/tools/vision/vision.py of the component Vision Tool. Performing a manipulation of the argument image results in server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 2.1.2 is capable of addressing this issue. The patch is named e85290cddcbb5ffc9c235927f4c92e5b4c3ec264. The affected component should be upgraded.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15628
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15628/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15628)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15628"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15628/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15628"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).