Skip to content

CVE-2026-15699

Code Injection: Is CVE-2026-15699 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.3%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-94 · Code Injection
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A vulnerability was identified in spencermountain compromise up to 14.15.1. Affected is the function nlp.extend of the file src/API/extend.js of the component Public Root API. The manipulation of the argument plugin leads to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The identifier of the patch is b4644ab7179700df0607521f61c1ee9b5f78d89d. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15699
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15699/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15699)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15699"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15699/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15699"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-94 · Code Injection.