Skip to content

CVE-2026-2340

is CVE-2026-2340real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Medium · CVSS 6.5EPSS 0.9%CWE-280

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-2340
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2340/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2340)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2340"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2340/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-2340"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.