Skip to content

CVE-2026-34577

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2026-34577 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
8.6 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.5%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:Gitroom

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Prior to version 2.21.3, the GET /public/stream endpoint in PublicController accepts a user-supplied url query parameter and proxies the full HTTP response back to the caller. The only validation is url.endsWith('mp4'), which is trivially bypassable by appending .mp4 as a query parameter value or URL fragment. The endpoint requires no authentication and has no SSRF protections, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to read responses from internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and other network-internal resources. This issue has been patched in version 2.21.3.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-34577
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-34577/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-34577)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-34577"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-34577/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-34577"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    This scores high on paper (CVSS 8.6) but the real-world signal is low. It is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit was found, and near-term exploitation looks unlikely (EPSS about 0%). Verify your own exposure before treating it as urgent. It is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, which is the most dangerous profile. Not an emergency for most teams, but patch it in your normal cycle and check whether the affected component is actually exposed in your setup.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Related CVEs

Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).