CVE-2026-36956
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): is CVE-2026-36956real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Real, but low real-world risk
A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the Dbit N300 T1 Pro wireless router V1.0.0. The router fails to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints such as /api/setWlan. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-36956)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-36956"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-36956/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-36956"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
0 verdictsNo account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
- CVE-2016-6277HIGH 8.8KEVEPSS 100%
NETGEAR R6250 before 1.0.4.6.Beta, R6400 before 1.0.1.18.Beta, R6700 before 1.0.1.14.Beta, R6900, R7000 before 1.0.7.6.Beta, R7100LG before 1.0.0.28.Beta, R7300DST before 1.0.0.46.Beta, R7900 before 1.0.1.8.Beta, R8000 before 1.0.3.26.Beta, D6220, D6400, D7000, and possibly other routers allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the path info to cgi-bin/.
- CVE-2025-68052HIGH 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Eagle Booking <= 1.3.4.3 versions.
- CVE-2026-52784HIGH 8.8
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.3 and 17.4.1, there is a CSRF on TARGET through /users/:id via POST parameter "user[admin]". This vulnerability is fixed in 17.3.3 and 17.4.1.
- CVE-2026-57659HIGH 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Paid Memberships Pro - Add Member From Admin <= 0.7.2 versions.
- CVE-2026-57655HIGH 8.2
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Child Theme Wizard <= 1.4 versions.
- CVE-2026-57751HIGH 8.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Heateor Social Login <= 1.1.39 versions.