CVE-2026-46247
Is CVE-2026-46247 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Low signal — verdict needed
Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clk: qcom: gfx3d: add parent to parent request map After commit d228ece36345 ("clk: divider: remove round_rate() in favor of determine_rate()") determining GFX3D clock rate crashes, because the passed parent map doesn't provide the expected best_parent_hw clock (with the roundd_rate path before the offending commit the best_parent_hw was ignored). Set the field in parent_req in addition to setting it in the req, fixing the crash. clk_hw_round_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1764) (P) clk_divider_bestdiv (drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:336) divider_determine_rate (drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:358) clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_determine_rate (drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c:1275) clk_core_determine_round_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1606) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1701) __clk_determine_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1741) clk_gfx3d_determine_rate (drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:1268) clk_core_determine_round_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1606) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1701) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1710) clk_round_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1804) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1440 (discriminator 1)) msm_devfreq_target (drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c:51) devfreq_set_target (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:360) devfreq_update_target (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:426) devfreq_monitor (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:458) process_one_work (arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:110 kernel/workqueue.c:3284) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3356 (discriminator 2) kernel/workqueue.c:3443 (discriminator 2)) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:467) ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:861)
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-46247)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-46247"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-46247/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-46247"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsCurated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.
No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
- 0
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.