Skip to content

CVE-2026-55418

Is CVE-2026-55418 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
8.6 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.3%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-639
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

FastGPT is an open source AI knowledge base platform. Prior to v4.15.0-beta5, two FastGPT file handlers authorize an unrelated resource and then sign or read an S3 object using a key taken directly from the request, without checking that the key belongs to the caller's team. Because S3 object keys are global within the bucket and carry the tenant id only as a path segment, an attacker can supply another team's key and obtain its file contents through the chat-file presign endpoint or dataset preview endpoint. This issue is fixed in version v4.15.0-beta5.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-55418
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55418/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55418)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55418"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55418/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-55418"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-639.