Skip to content

CVE-2026-55450

Exposure of Sensitive Information: is CVE-2026-55450real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Base severity
9.3 Critical
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.3%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:Langflow

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:H

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.1, unauthenticated users can upload any amount of data to the server without any limitations. No need for any prior knowledge, only network access to Langflow. This can lead to space exhaustion on the server. In addition, in the response, the absolute path of the uploaded file is reported to the attacker, which is an information leak that can assist in chaining other primitives. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.1.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-55450
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55450/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55450)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55450"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-55450/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-55450"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information.