Skip to content

CVE-2026-7303

Is CVE-2026-7303 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
3.7 Low
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.4%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-99
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

A security flaw has been discovered in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.3.2. Impacted is the function logDetailCat of the file xxl-job-admin/src/main/java/com/xxl/job/admin/controller/biz/JobLogController.java of the component Execution Log Handler. The manipulation of the argument logId results in improper control of resource identifiers. The attack may be performed from remote. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 3.4.0 is recommended to address this issue. The patch is identified as d24e4ccd6073cc75305e1d3b9c29bc8db7437e7a. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-7303
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7303/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7303)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7303"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7303/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-7303"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-99.