Is CVE-2026-9143 exploitable?

No community verdicts yet for CVE-2026-9143. Be the first to weigh in.

Is CVE-2026-9143 a false positive?

No community verdicts yet for CVE-2026-9143.

How do I remediate CVE-2026-9143?

See the authoritative references (NVD, vendor advisory) and community field notes on this page for remediation guidance.

CVE-2026-9143

is CVE-2026-9143real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

Low · CVSS 3.7EPSS 0.2%CWE-681

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

There is an incorrect conversion between numeric types vulnerability in NI grpc-device due to missing range checks in CodeGen. This may silently discard high bits if a size value exceeded the target type's range. This affects NI grpc-device 2.17.0 and prior versions.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published Jun 19, 2026

Embed this verdict

Markdown

[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9143/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9143)

HTML

<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9143"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9143/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9143"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts

Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

Add a field note or remediationoptional