Skip to content

CVE-2026-9240

Missing Authorization: Is CVE-2026-9240 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
4.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.2%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-862 · Missing Authorization
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

The Colissimo Officiel : Méthodes de livraison pour WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the updateShippingMethod() function (registered to the wp_ajax_lpc_order_affect AJAX action) in versions up to, and including, 2.9.0. This is due to the handler performing no current_user_can() capability check and no nonce verification before reading an attacker-supplied order_id and modifying that order's shipping method, pickup-point meta, and shipping address. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to create or modify the shipment information (shipping method, pickup relay data, and shipping address) of arbitrary WooCommerce orders, including orders placed by other users.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9240
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9240/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9240)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9240"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9240/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9240"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-862 · Missing Authorization.