Hpe: community verdicts
4 notable / known-exploited Hpe CVEs the community has triaged.
Show as table
| Year published | CVEs | In CISA KEV |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 |
Exploitation first, with newly exploited CVEs rising above old ones
- CVE-2015-5477HIGH 7.5KEVEPSS 100%
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion failure and daemon exit) via TKEY queries.
- CVE-2025-37164CRIT 10KEVEPSS 90%
A remote code execution issue exists in HPE OneView.
- CVE-2017-5689CRIT 9.8KEVEPSS 92%
An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) and Intel Standard Manageability (ISM). An unprivileged local attacker could provision manageability features gaining unprivileged network or local system privileges on Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT), Intel Standard Manageability (ISM), and Intel Small Business Technology (SBT).
- CVE-2002-20001HIGH 7.5EPSS 25%
The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE.