Skip to content

CVE-2019-14750

Cross-site Scripting: Is CVE-2019-14750 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
Exploit-DB
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.1 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
12%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-79 · Cross-site Scripting
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

A working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

An issue was discovered in osTicket before 1.10.7 and 1.12.x before 1.12.1. Stored XSS exists in setup/install.php. It was observed that no input sanitization was provided in the firstname and lastname fields of the application. The insertion of malicious queries in those fields leads to the execution of those queries. This can further lead to cookie stealing or other malicious actions.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2019-14750
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-14750/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-14750)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-14750"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2019-14750/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2019-14750"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-79 · Cross-site Scripting.