CVE-2021-26085
Is CVE-2021-26085 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
Confirmed exploited in the wild. Patch this first, regardless of the base score.
public exploits
links to sources — we don’t host codeA working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Real — exploited in the wild
CISA confirms active exploitation. Treat scanner hits as true positives unless your specific version or config is unaffected.
Based on CISA KEV
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Affected versions of Atlassian Confluence Server allow remote attackers to view restricted resources via a Pre-Authorization Arbitrary File Read vulnerability in the /s/ endpoint. The affected versions are before version 7.4.10, and from version 7.5.0 before 7.12.3.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2021-26085)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2021-26085"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2021-26085/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2021-26085"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsCurated baseline: TruePositive's read from public sources is Real & exploitable — a starting point, not a community verdict.
No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
- 0
This is confirmed exploited in the wild. It is in the CISA KEV catalog, so attackers are actively using it, not just researchers. It is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, which is the most dangerous profile. Patch this on priority and confirm the fix holds.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-425.
- CVE-2024-45195HIGH 7.5KEVEPSS 100%
Direct Request ('Forced Browsing') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.16, which fixes the issue.
- CVE-2026-25679HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 1%
url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.
- CVE-2026-10521HIGH 7.2Real · low riskEPSS 0%
An high privileged remote attacker can access a hidden configuration method, that should not be accessible by any user, to modify critical program parameters. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability.
- CVE-2026-7500MED 5.4EPSS 0%
When Keycloak is started with `--features-disabled=account,account-api`, the Account REST API is only partially disabled. Five endpoints under the versioned path `/account/v1alpha1` remain fully functional — including both read and write operations — because they lack the `checkAccountApiEnabled()` gate that correctly blocks four other endpoints in the same REST service class. The user needs to have permissions to use the API.
- CVE-2026-9610LOW 2.3EPSS 0%
IBM Datacap 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 and IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 exposes resources or functionality that isn't linked in the UI but is accessible by directly requesting the URL, bypassing intended access controls.
- CVE-2024-23573LOW 3.7EPSS 0%
HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the Application is vulnerable to Lucky 13. that makes the SS LLUCKY13 possible affects the TLS1.1and 1.2 and DTLS1.0 or 1.2 implementations . It also affects previous versions such as SSL3.0 and TLS1.0. This can also be considered a type of man-in-the-middle attack.