Skip to content

CVE-2026-2670

Is CVE-2026-2670 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
PoC (unverified)
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.2 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
12%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-77
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

Unverified proof-of-concept code has been published. It may or may not be functional — assess before relying on it.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability was identified in Advantech WISE-6610-NB, WISE-6610-EB, WISE-6610-TB, WISE-6610-JB, WISE-6610-CB, WISE-6610-EL-NB, WISE-6610-EL-EB, WISE-6610-EL-TB, WISE-6610-EL-JB, WISE-6610-EL-CB, WISE-6610P-DEA, WISE-6610P-DNA and WISE-6610P-DTA 1.2.1_20251110. Affected is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/luci/admin/openvpn_apply of the component Background Management. Such manipulation of the argument delete_file leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. Upgrading to version 1.2.4_20260821 is able to address this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor explains: "The delete operation has been redesigned to map the requested file type to a fixed allowlisted path, require a numeric tunnel ID, reject invalid requests, and use the native filesystem API (fs.unlink) instead of constructing a shell command from request data."

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-2670
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2670/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2670)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2670"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-2670/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-2670"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet. FIRST EPSS estimates about a 16% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, which is high relative to most CVEs.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-77.