Skip to content

CVE-2026-41679

Improper Authentication: Is CVE-2026-41679 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Yes
VulnCheck KEV · Aug 17, 2026
Public exploit
Metasploit +1
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
10 Critical
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
32%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-287 · Improper Authentication
CWE

Reported exploited in the wild (VulnCheck KEV), though not in CISA KEV yet. Treat it as urgent and check your exposure.

cisa ssvc

CISA Vulnrichment · assessed

Exploitation
Public PoC
in the wild
Automatable
Yes
at scale
Technical impact
Total
on success

CISA decision, by how critical the affected system is to you:

  • low impact → Track
  • medium impact → Track*
  • high impact → Attend

Track: normal patch cycle · Track*: watch closely · Attend: patch sooner · Act: patch now. About SSVC ↗

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

A working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.

affected packages

GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 · GitHub rates it critical
  • npmpaperclipai
    Vulnerable
    < 2026.410.0
    Fixed in
    2026.410.0
  • npm@paperclipai/server
    Vulnerable
    < 2026.410.0
    Fixed in
    2026.410.0

Source: GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0), via OSV.dev. Check your lockfile version against the ranges above.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:Paperclip

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Prior to version 2026.416.0, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve full remote code execution on any network-accessible Paperclip instance running in `authenticated` mode with default configuration. No user interaction, no credentials, just the target's address. The chain consists of six API calls. The attack is fully automated, requires no user interaction, and works against the default deployment configuration. Version 2026.416.0 patches the issue.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-41679
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-41679/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-41679)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-41679"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-41679/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-41679"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

timeline

  1. Public exploit recorded · 2 sources
  2. Added to VulnCheck KEV · reported exploited in the wild
  3. CISA SSVC assessment · exploitation: poc
  4. Published by NVD

Score and exploit changes tracked since .

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: TruePositive's read from public sources is Real & exploitable — a starting point, not a community verdict.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet. FIRST EPSS estimates about a 32% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, which is high relative to most CVEs. It is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, which is the most dangerous profile.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-287 · Improper Authentication.