Skip to content

CVE-2024-38472

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2024-38472 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.

Give your verdict☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
PoC (unverified)
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.5 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
69%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

High severity and high exploitation probability. Prioritise remediation.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code
GitHub PoC(2)unverified

Unverified proof-of-concept code has been published. It may or may not be functional — assess before relying on it.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Likely real & worth prioritising

High base severity and a high real-world exploitation probability both point to a genuine, actively targeted issue.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

SSRF in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via SSRF and malicious requests or content Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.60 which fixes this issue.  Note: Existing configurations that access UNC paths will have to configure new directive "UNCList" to allow access during request processing.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-38472
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-38472/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-38472)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-38472"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-38472/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-38472"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Related CVEs

    Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).