Skip to content

CVE-2024-9264

Code Injection: Is CVE-2024-9264 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
Metasploit +1
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
9.9 Critical
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
98%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-94 · Code Injection
CWE

High severity and high exploitation probability. Prioritise remediation.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

A working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Likely real & worth prioritising

High base severity and a high real-world exploitation probability both point to a genuine, actively targeted issue.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The SQL Expressions experimental feature of Grafana allows for the evaluation of `duckdb` queries containing user input. These queries are insufficiently sanitized before being passed to `duckdb`, leading to a command injection and local file inclusion vulnerability. Any user with the VIEWER or higher permission is capable of executing this attack. The `duckdb` binary must be present in Grafana's $PATH for this attack to function; by default, this binary is not installed in Grafana distributions.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-9264
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-9264/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-9264)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-9264"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-9264/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-9264"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-94 · Code Injection.