Skip to content

CVE-2025-56589

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2025-56589 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.5 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.4%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A Local File Inclusion (LFI) and a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in the InsertFromHtmlString() function of the Apryse HTML2PDF SDK thru 11.6.0. These vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to read local files on the server or make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external services. Both vulnerabilities could lead to the disclosure of sensitive data or potential system takeover.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-56589
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-56589/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-56589)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-56589"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-56589/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-56589"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Related CVEs

    Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).