Skip to content

CVE-2025-67780

Missing Authentication for Critical Function: Is CVE-2025-67780 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
PoC (unverified)
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
4.2 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.1%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-306 · Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

Unverified proof-of-concept code has been published. It may or may not be functional — assess before relying on it.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Officially disputed

The CVE record itself is disputed or rejected upstream — a strong candidate for a false positive in scanners. Confirm with a verdict.

Based on NVD record status

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

SpaceX Starlink Dish devices with firmware 2024.12.04.mr46620 (e.g., on Mini1_prod2) allow administrative actions via unauthenticated LAN gRPC requests, aka MARMALADE 2. The cross-origin policy can be bypassed by omitting a Referer header. In some cases, an attacker's ability to read tilt, rotation, and elevation data via gRPC can make it easier to infer the geographical location of the dish. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because unauthenticated LAN gRPC is intended behavior for certain mobile app integration, and because the cross-origin policy is correctly enforced for gRPC-Web (port 9201), i.e., it is not a valid vulnerability report.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-67780
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-67780/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-67780)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-67780"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-67780/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-67780"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-306 · Missing Authentication for Critical Function.