CVE-2025-8732
is CVE-2025-8732real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Low signal — verdict needed
Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
A vulnerability was found in libxml2 up to 2.14.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function xmlParseSGMLCatalog of the component xmlcatalog. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled recursion. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The code maintainer explains, that "[t]he issue can only be triggered with untrusted SGML catalogs and it makes absolutely no sense to use untrusted catalogs. I also doubt that anyone is still using SGML catalogs at all."
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-8732)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-8732"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-8732/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-8732"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
0 verdictsNo account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-404.
- CVE-2018-8120HIGH 7KEVEPSS 74%
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8124, CVE-2018-8164, CVE-2018-8166.
- CVE-2018-8453HIGH 7.8KEVEPSS 70%
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers.
- CVE-2018-8639HIGH 7.8KEVEPSS 22%
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8641.
- CVE-2021-41441HIGH 7.4Real · low riskEPSS 2%
A DoS attack in the web application of D-Link DIR-X1860 before v1.10WWB09_Beta allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to reboot the router via sending a specially crafted URL to an authenticated victim. The authenticated victim need to visit this URL, for the router to reboot.
- CVE-2022-35191MED 6.5EPSS 1%
D-Link Wireless AC1200 Dual Band VDSL ADSL Modem Router DSL-3782 Firmware v1.01 allows unauthenticated attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP connection request.
- CVE-2024-33844HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 1%
The 'control' in Parrot ANAFI USA firmware 1.10.4 does not check the MAV_MISSION_TYPE(0, 1, 2, 255), which allows attacker to cut off the connection between a controller and the drone by sending MAVLink MISSION_COUNT command with a wrong MAV_MISSION_TYPE.