CVE-2026-10101
Is CVE-2026-10101 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Low signal — verdict needed
Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
ACM/MCE assisted-service writes raw referenced pull-secret contents into `InfraEnv.status.conditions[].message` when pull-secret validation fails. A namespace principal with the stock `view` ClusterRole cannot directly read Secrets, but can read `InfraEnv` objects and recover the referenced Secret's `.dockerconfigjson` data from status. This bypasses the Kubernetes/OpenShift RBAC separation between read-only namespace viewers and Secret readers. In the reproduced proof, the same ServiceAccount was denied `get` and `list` on Secrets, but recovered synthetic pull-secret `username`, `password`, `email`, and base64 `auth` fields through `InfraEnv.status`.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10101)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10101"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10101/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-10101"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsCurated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.
No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
- 0
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-201.
- CVE-2026-44487HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 1%
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 0.32.0 and 1.16.0, Axios’s Node.js HTTP adapter may forward a Proxy-Authorization header to a redirected origin during specific proxy-to-direct redirect flows. This affects Node.js usage, where an initial HTTP request is sent through an authenticated HTTP proxy, redirects are followed, and the redirected URL is no longer proxied. Under affected redirect shapes, the final origin can receive the proxy credential that was intended only for the outbound proxy. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.
- CVE-2026-39912CRIT 9.1Real · low riskEPSS 1%
V2Board 1.6.1 through 1.7.4 and Xboard through 0.1.9 expose authentication tokens in HTTP response bodies of the loginWithMailLink endpoint when the login_with_mail_link_enable feature is active. Unauthenticated attackers can POST to the loginWithMailLink endpoint with a known email address to receive the full authentication URL in the response, then exchange the token at the token2Login endpoint to obtain a valid bearer token with complete account access including admin privileges.
- CVE-2026-5483HIGH 8.5Real · low riskEPSS 0%
A flaw was found in odh-dashboard in Red Hat Openshift AI. This vulnerability in the `odh-dashboard` component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) allows for the disclosure of Kubernetes Service Account tokens through a NodeJS endpoint. This could enable an attacker to gain unauthorized access to Kubernetes resources.
- CVE-2026-34226HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 0%
Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Versions prior to 20.8.9 may attach cookies from the current page origin (`window.location`) instead of the request target URL when `fetch(..., { credentials: "include" })` is used. This can leak cookies from origin A to destination B. Version 20.8.9 fixes the issue.
- CVE-2026-54171MED 6.5EPSS 0%
Excon is usable, fast, simple HTTP 1.1 for Ruby. Prior to 1.5.0, Excon's RedirectFollower middleware failed to strip additional sensitive headers when following redirects and did not provide a custom list of headers to strip. This could cause inadvertent leakage of sensitive data when the initial request includes header information that is not intended for the new target. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.0.
- CVE-2026-42505MED 5.3EPSS 0%
Handshakes which used Encrypted Client Hello could be de-anonymized by a passive network observer due to a disclosure of pre-shared key identities in the unencrypted client hello.