CVE-2026-10997
Incorrect Permission Assignment: Is CVE-2026-10997 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Low signal — verdict needed
Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to bypass discretionary access control via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10997)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10997"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-10997/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-10997"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsCurated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.
No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
- 0
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-732 · Incorrect Permission Assignment.
- CVE-2018-13374MED 4.3KEVEPSS 38%
A Improper Access Control in Fortinet FortiOS 6.0.2, 5.6.7 and before, FortiADC 6.1.0, 6.0.0 to 6.0.1, 5.4.0 to 5.4.4 allows attacker to obtain the LDAP server login credentials configured in FortiGate via pointing a LDAP server connectivity test request to a rogue LDAP server instead of the configured one.
- CVE-2021-40649MED 6.5EPSS 1%
In Connx Version 6.2.0.1269 (20210623), a cookie can be issued by the application and not have the HttpOnly flag set.
- CVE-2022-35167HIGH 8.8Real · low riskEPSS 1%
Printix Cloud Print Management v1.3.1149.0 for Windows was discovered to contain insecure permissions.
- CVE-2023-39003HIGH 7.5Real · low riskEPSS 1%
OPNsense Community Edition before 23.7 and Business Edition before 23.4.2 was discovered to contain insecure permissions in the directory /tmp.
- CVE-2024-45497HIGH 7.6Real · low riskEPSS 1%
A flaw was found in the OpenShift build process, where the docker-build container is configured with a hostPath volume mount that maps the node's /var/lib/kubelet/config.json file into the build pod. This file contains sensitive credentials necessary for pulling images from private repositories. The mount is not read-only, which allows the attacker to overwrite it. By modifying the config.json file, the attacker can cause a denial of service by preventing the node from pulling new images and potentially exfiltrating sensitive secrets. This flaw impacts the availability of services dependent on image pulls and exposes sensitive information to unauthorized parties.
- CVE-2025-45150CRIT 9.8Real · low riskEPSS 1%
Insecure permissions in LangChain-ChatGLM-Webui commit ef829 allows attackers to arbitrarily view and download sensitive files via supplying a crafted request.