Skip to content

CVE-2026-13752

SQL Injection: is CVE-2026-13752real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Base severity
6 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
n/a
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-89 · SQL Injection
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Improper neutralization of parameters in Snowflake CLI versions prior to 3.19 allowed unintended SQL execution. An attacker could exploit this by supplying crafted values to vulnerable command paths, causing Snowflake CLI to execute unintended SQL in the context of the user’s Snowflake session. Successful exploitation required crafted values to reach vulnerable parameters, including through socially engineered input, malicious repository configuration, or compromised automation feeding external values into the CLI, and impact is limited by the privileges assigned to the active session. The fix is available in Snowflake CLI version 3.19, and users must manually upgrade.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-13752
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-13752/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-13752)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-13752"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-13752/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-13752"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-89 · SQL Injection.