Skip to content

CVE-2026-14750

Is CVE-2026-14750 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.3 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.3%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-74
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A security flaw has been discovered in mjperpinosa stumasy up to 327d1b0f2915ba79d7ef8ebb74553e987609d9be. The affected element is the function Notes_controller::accessing_dictionary_authorization of the file application/PHP/objects/notes/accessing_dictionary_authorization.php. The manipulation of the argument Password results in sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-14750
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14750/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14750)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14750"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14750/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-14750"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-74.