Skip to content

CVE-2026-15500

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2026-15500 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
n/a
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A weakness has been identified in AstrBotDevs AstrBot up to 4.25.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_online_plugins of the file astrbot/dashboard/routes/plugin.py of the component market_list Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument custom_registry can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15500
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15500/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15500)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15500"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15500/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15500"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Related CVEs

    Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).