Skip to content

CVE-2026-15481

Is CVE-2026-15481 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
8.8 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.4%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-74
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A security flaw has been discovered in Trendnet TEW-635BRM up to 1.00.03. This vulnerability affects the function ipoa_test of the file /sbin/rc of the component IPoA WAN Connection Setup. Performing a manipulation of the argument ipoa_ipaddr results in command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor explains: "We are unable to confirm if the vulnerability exists. This item has been EOL since 2011. We will make an official announcement of possible vulnerabilities, and recommend users to switch devices." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15481
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15481/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15481)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15481"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15481/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15481"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-74.