Skip to content

CVE-2026-15531

Improper Input Validation: Is CVE-2026-15531 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
5.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
n/a
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A vulnerability has been found in yashbhalgat HashNeRF-pytorch up to 82885e698295982504eb6a26d060a6b2473e3706. Affected by this issue is the function torch.load of the file run_nerf.py of the component Checkpoint File Handler. The manipulation of the argument ckpt_path leads to deserialization. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15531
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15531/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15531)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15531"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-15531/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-15531"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation.