Skip to content

CVE-2026-16124

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Is CVE-2026-16124 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
6.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.3%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A security vulnerability has been detected in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.15.0-beta.32. This affects the function CheckSSRF/isPrivateIP of the file internal/tools/web_shared.go of the component web_fetch. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 3.15.0-beta.33 is able to mitigate this issue. The name of the patch is 12a0168271827650ddb0026d6277fbadf3dcf3ea. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-16124
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-16124/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-16124)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-16124"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-16124/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-16124"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Related CVEs

Same weakness: CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).