Skip to content

CVE-2026-32250

Cross-site Scripting: Is CVE-2026-32250 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
4.3 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.2%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-79 · Cross-site Scripting
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

NamelessMC is website software for Minecraft servers. A Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was discovered in version 2.2.4 in the id parameter of the endpoint `/index.php?route=/queries/user/`. The application reflects user-supplied input from the id parameter into the HTML response without proper sanitization or output encoding. An attacker can craft a malicious URL containing JavaScript code. When a victim visits the crafted URL, the injected script executes in the victim's browser within the context of the vulnerable application. This could allow attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript, potentially leading to session hijacking, phishing attacks, or manipulation of page content. Version 2.2.5 fixes the issue.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-32250
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-32250/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-32250)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-32250"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-32250/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-32250"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-79 · Cross-site Scripting.