Skip to content

CVE-2026-65699

Is CVE-2026-65699 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
4.2 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
n/a
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-639
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

AgentGPT through 1.0.0 contains an authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability that allows authenticated users to attach tasks to another user's agent run by supplying a target run_id in the request body without ownership verification. The AgentCRUD.create_task and validate_task_count functions look up the target AgentRun using the client-supplied run_id without confirming the run belongs to the requesting user, enabling an attacker who obtains a valid run_id to corrupt task history, exhaust the per-run loop budget, and drive LLM costs against the victim's run.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-65699
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-65699/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-65699)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-65699"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-65699/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-65699"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-639.