Skip to content

CVE-2026-9765

Is CVE-2026-9765 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.1 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
n/a
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
Not classified
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Note: The CVE and blog post don't exist because we determined this is actually a cloud-only issue. Access Controls are “Broken” when a user can access resources they are not authorized to access. An attacker can bypass any access control mechanisms in a web application, and gain unauthorized access to resources that are not available with their permissions. Broken access control can allow attackers to: Access resources only accessible to certain users, thus allowing unauthorized access to data Perform operations on behalf of other users, leading to account takeovers in the worst cases Attempt privilege escalation Attempt to take over an account

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9765
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9765/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9765)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9765"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9765/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9765"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.