Skip to content

CVE-2026-9713

SQL Injection: Is CVE-2026-9713 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.5 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.5%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-89 · SQL Injection
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Real, but low real-world risk

A genuine vulnerability on paper, but EPSS shows little real-world exploitation — the base score may overstate urgency. This is not the same as a false positive.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The Lumise Product Designer for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'id' and 'table' parameters in the uploaded cart JSON file processed by the checkout AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-supplied parameters before they are appended directly to a raw SQL query in the find_resource() function — the 'id' field is interpolated without quotes into a WHERE clause (numeric context) and 'table' is interpolated into the FROM clause, neither of which is protected by wp_magic_quotes or passed through $wpdb->prepare(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9713
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9713/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9713)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9713"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-9713/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-9713"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    This scores high on paper (CVSS 7.5) but the real-world signal is low. It is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit was found, and near-term exploitation looks unlikely (EPSS about 0%). Verify your own exposure before treating it as urgent. It is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, which is the most dangerous profile. Not an emergency for most teams, but patch it in your normal cycle and check whether the affected component is actually exposed in your setup.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-89 · SQL Injection.