Skip to content

CVE-2024-30085

Is CVE-2024-30085 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.

Give your verdict☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
Metasploit +1
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
7.8 High
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
15%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-122
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

cisa ssvc

CISA Vulnrichment · assessed

Exploitation
Public PoC
in the wild
Automatable
No
at scale
Technical impact
Total
on success

CISA decision, by how critical the affected system is to you:

  • low impact → Track
  • medium impact → Track*
  • high impact → Attend

Track: normal patch cycle · Track*: watch closely · Attend: patch sooner · Act: patch now. About SSVC ↗

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code
MetasploitGitHub PoC(2)unverified

A working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:Microsoft

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

NVD only has a brief summary for this one. The community fills in the real-world detail below.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-30085
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30085/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30085)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30085"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2024-30085/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2024-30085"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

timeline

  1. CISA SSVC assessment · exploitation: poc
  2. Published by NVD

Score and exploit changes tracked since .

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: TruePositive's read from public sources is Real & exploitable — a starting point, not a community verdict.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    There is a Metasploit module for this, so exploitation is easy and reliable even without deep skill. Treat it as exploitable. FIRST EPSS estimates about a 15% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, which is high relative to most CVEs. It needs local access, so it reads more as a privilege-escalation or post-access risk than a remote one. Patch this on priority and confirm the fix holds.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Related CVEs

Same weakness: CWE-122.