Skip to content

CVE-2025-1182

Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer: Is CVE-2025-1182 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.

Give your verdict☆ Watch

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
5 Medium
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.6%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

cisa ssvc

CISA Vulnrichment · assessed

Exploitation
Public PoC
in the wild
Automatable
No
at scale
Technical impact
Partial
on success

CISA decision, by how critical the affected system is to you:

  • low impact → Track
  • medium impact → Track
  • high impact → Track*

Track: normal patch cycle · Track*: watch closely · Attend: patch sooner · Act: patch now. About SSVC ↗

scanner noise

anonymous, aggregated from real reports · via Denoizr
ScannerFlagged inTurned out noise
Wiz1 scan0%

How often this CVE was flagged by each scanner and how much turned out to be noise (false positives), aggregated anonymously from de-noised reports. Higher noise means the alert is more often not a real risk — verify your exposure.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:GNU

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. Affected is the function bfd_elf_reloc_symbol_deleted_p of the file bfd/elflink.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as b425859021d17adf62f06fb904797cf8642986ad. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-1182
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-1182/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-1182)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-1182"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2025-1182/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2025-1182"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

timeline

  1. CISA SSVC assessment · exploitation: poc
  2. Published by NVD

Score and exploit changes tracked since .

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Related CVEs

Same weakness: CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer.