Skip to content

CVE-2026-11499

Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer: Is CVE-2026-11499 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
PoC (unverified)
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
9.8 Critical
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
7%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer
CWE

High CVSS base score, but low real-world exploitation probability (EPSS). Likely less urgent than the score implies.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

Unverified proof-of-concept code has been published. It may or may not be functional — assess before relying on it.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability was determined in Tenda HG7HG9 and HG10 300001138_en_xpon. This affects the function formDOMAINBLK of the file /boaform/formDOMAINBLK. Executing a manipulation of the argument blkDomain can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-11499
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11499/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11499)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11499"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11499/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-11499"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: A curated baseline from public sources, shown separately from community verdicts.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit was found for this yet. It is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, which is the most dangerous profile.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer.