Skip to content

CVE-2026-14759

Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer: Is CVE-2026-14759 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
None known
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
3.3 Low
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
0.2%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer
CWE

Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:Radare

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A security flaw has been discovered in radareorg radare2 up to 6.1.6. This issue affects the function r_bin_java_inner_classes_attr_calc_size of the file shlr/java/class.c of the component RBinJava Line Number Table Parser. Performing a manipulation results in heap-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The patch is named cd62d15a6cbecdc67fd03f3ebdbbbeb741d18f87. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-14759
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14759/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14759)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14759"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-14759/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-14759"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Memory Buffer.