Skip to content

CVE-2026-35025

is CVE-2026-35025real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

High · CVSS 8.1CWE-59

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

ProFTPD through 1.3.9b and 1.3.10rc2 contains an access control bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated FTP users to circumvent Directory ACL restrictions by prefixing paths with /proc/self/root in the RNFR command handler. Attackers can exploit the unresolved symlink components in dir_canonical_path() to cause dir_check() to perform lexical path comparisons that match no configured Directory block, enabling rename operations on files in DenyAll-protected directories and subsequent retrieval of those files. Mitigation: Sessions configured with DefaultRoot (chroot) are not affected, as chroot changes the directory to which /proc/self/root resolves.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-35025
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-35025/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-35025)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-35025"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-35025/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-35025"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-59.