Is CVE-2026-56272 exploitable?

No community verdicts yet for CVE-2026-56272. Be the first to weigh in.

Is CVE-2026-56272 a false positive?

No community verdicts yet for CVE-2026-56272.

How do I remediate CVE-2026-56272?

See the authoritative references (NVD, vendor advisory) and community field notes on this page for remediation guidance.

CVE-2026-56272

is CVE-2026-56272real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

☆ Watch

Medium · CVSS 4.1CWE-916

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Flowise before 3.0.13 uses bcrypt with default salt rounds of 5, providing only 32 iterations instead of the OWASP-recommended minimum of 10 rounds. Attackers can crack password hashes approximately 30 times faster with modern GPU hardware, potentially compromising all user accounts in a database breach scenario.

References

NVD MITRE CVE.org

Published Jun 24, 2026

Embed this verdict

Markdown

[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56272/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56272)

HTML

<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56272"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56272/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-56272"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts

Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

Add a field note or remediationoptional