Skip to content

CVE-2026-11968

is CVE-2026-11968real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Medium · CVSS 5.5EPSS 0.2%CWE-88

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Argument Injection in TortoiseGitBlame via Malicious Git History Filenames Leads to Arbitrary File Write in TortoiseGit

NVD only has a brief summary for this one. The community fills in the real-world detail below.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-11968
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11968/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11968)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11968"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-11968/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-11968"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

    Same weakness: CWE-88.