Skip to content

CVE-2026-7574

is CVE-2026-7574real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

High · CVSS 8.7EPSS 0.1%CWE-353

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

Anthropic Claude Desktop Cowork VM image handling (confirmed across v1.1348.0 through v1.2278.0, including v1.1348.0, v1.1617.0, and v1.2278.0) validates only file presence and a version marker string before booting rootfs.img, but does not verify image content integrity at time-of-use. A local attacker with unprivileged code execution as the victim macOS user can modify the VM root filesystem image and have it trusted on subsequent Cowork VM boots, enabling persistent arbitrary code execution in the VM and access to host-mounted directories. The estimated CWE mapping is CWE-353 (Missing Support for Integrity Check).

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-7574
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7574/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7574)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7574"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-7574/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-7574"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

Community ground truth

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

0 verdicts
Not a real issue

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.

    Add a field note or remediationoptional
    Note type

    What are you adding?

    Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.